Christina a Victim of Infanticide

Human sacrifice as shown in the Codex Magliabechiano, Folio 70. A Heart-extraction.

“The most prominent cell line used in relation to the Covid19 vaccine is called HEK 293. It comes from an abortion performed in the  Netherlands in 1972. It is labeled 293 because that is how many experimental attempts the researchers needed to get a working cell line. Therefore, hundreds of abortions went into the project, even if they didn’t result in the working line. 

HEK stands for human embryonic kidney. To harvest a viable embryonic kidney for this type of cell line, a sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs. Instead of being held, rocked, and comforted in the time intervening between their birth and their death, they have their organs cut out of them alive.

There is no way that a spontaneous abortion could result in the cell line, as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested. The deliberate killing of a child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for  scientific pharmacological research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.”

Both abortion and infanticide were illegal in the Netherlands in 1972, when this healthy human being was removed from the womb and killed in the process of taking from her the organs desired for scientific pharmacological research.

The baby girl was never given a name, although those who murdered her were well aware that this baby living outside the womb was a girl.  I suppose it was felt that she didn’t deserve a name or was unworthy of a human name. Or perhaps, it was felt if she were given a name, it would make what had just done to her too clear to be endured. However, since her bodily remains were thrown in a trash can in 1972, without having a human name bestowed on her I will name her Christina.

But, is it not better that Christina be sacrificed on the altar of science and pharmacology than that the whole world perish from a manufactured virus that escapes from a bio-weapons laboratory? Sacrificing the one for the good of the many is just reasonable, isn’t it? In fact the more powerful have been sacrificing the less powerful around the world since before recorded history in order to protect themselves from one kind of fear and threat to earthly survival or another, e.g., from God’s wrath, disease, enemies, etc.

In Mesoamerica since at least 1200 BC to AD 1600 peoples have been engaged in human sacrifice. The Aztec and the Maya civilizations sacrificed thousands of their people yearly for some kind of protection or another. China practiced human sacrifice from 2300-384 BC. Japan did also, as did most of the Mediterranean and European peoples from the Stone Age on forward. The story of Abraham and Isaac (c.1700 BC) started the effort to end killing children as a sacrifice in Israel but in 900 BC Elijah is still trying to end it. The famous Gehenna in the Bible that Jesus refers to was a place of child sacrifice outside the south wall of Jerusalem. Rome outlawed child sacrifice in 94 BC.

Christina was not murdered arbitrarily by a crazy person. She was intentionally taken from the womb by a Caesarian operation, had her organs harvested while alive and without anesthesia, and murdered for the good of the many. Her life was sacrificed without her consent so that others could benefit biologically, financially, etc.; so that her cell line could give humanity the Covid19 vaccine in order to protect humanity from getting the virus and spreading the virus.

I can see how many Christians and others would in conscience feel it to be morally impermissible to be injected with a product which has a direct link to infanticide. I fully support them in their exercise of primacy of conscience, as every Catholic should. However, the folks who reject the Covid19 vaccine because  infanticide is a verifiable part of its history are, perhaps inadvertently, making visible a gargantuan moral issue of which most Christians and non-Christian are unaware.

Christina’s life was ripped from her and what was stolen from her did not just go into making the Covid19 vaccine but also was used to make over two hundred drugs that are readily available on the market in the U.S. today. The top twenty drugs used in the U.S. today all have some involvement with the same cell line (HEK 293) from which the Covid19 vaccine was made, and which were derived from Christina’s murder, infanticide. So, the issue I am primarily addressing in this article is not whether or not to be injected with the Covid19 vaccine, nor is it the pro-abortion—anti-abortion problem. The focus of this article is infanticide.

For those who are Christians and believe in the Nonviolent Jesus of the Gospels and His Way of Nonviolent Love of friends and enemies, killing a child inside the womb or outside the womb is murder. The same is true for anyone who is a Catholic. It even true for most who support abortion because infanticide is not abortion.

In war, infanticide, like abortion, is a common event, brushed off by the moral theologians, as “collateral damage.” However, in civil life in today’s societies, infanticide is illegal, close to a cultural taboo. The great operational exception—not a legal or moral exception—to this over the last sixty or seventy years has been the pharmaceutical industry. It has engaged in infanticide around the globe whenever it wanted. Most who have known this or should have known this, look the other way. Baby Christina was neither the first nor the last child  removed from the womb of his or her mother for the purpose of scientific pharmacological research. Yet, I do not recall one drug company advertising its product by saying, “This product was developed with the aid of an act of infanticide.

It seems to me, that any person serious about his or her position as a religious leader, e.g., a Pope, an Ayatollah, a Head Rabbi, a Dali Lama, etc. would want to be well informed on this matter, so that they could inform those who depend on them for spiritual and moral guidance, regarding which drugs have in their history of development an act of infanticide and which do not. Also it would seem, since it is now apparent that there are, only God knows how many, Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, etc. out there who in good conscience do not want to be injected with the Covid19 vaccine because it has infanticide in its history, it can be reasonably assumed that they might in conscience not want to take some other drugs with infanticide in their history. Therefore, pastoral integrity would seem to require that spiritual and moral leaders should be informed and should inform those in their spiritual care which drugs on the market are spiritually contaminated by infanticide in order that their people can exercise their right of conscience as to whether they want to purchase a drug or wish to find another drug that will be of help to them that does not have the stain of infanticide in its history.

So why don’t they have this information? Why haven’t they informed their people on this matter? Shouldn’t they? Isn’t it spiritually and morally relevant?

Most people are intuitively aware of what the slippery slope is that would inevitably follow from justifying infanticide for any reason. Hence, in the vast majority of countries infanticide is a crime regardless of whether the time spent outside the womb is 5 minutes or 5 months.

If the pharmaceutical industry has been engaged sub rosa in infanticide for over fifty years, getting only a wink and a nod from political and religious leaders in return for which a certain amount of monetary recompense from the pharmaceutical industry made its way into their hands, this would easily numerically overshadow Herod’s infanticide, his slaughter of the Holy Innocents.

If an evil exists and those who know it exists do not informs anyone that it is going on, then even the saints will participate in it believing what they are doing is good. This ipso facto assures that the Father’s will cannot “be done on earth as it is in heaven.” So I ask, may Catholic or Christian withhold information needed to live according to the Gospel without participating in evil?

The post Christina a Victim of Infanticide appeared first on LewRockwell.

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: